Thursday, November 7, 2013

The New Music Industry

It’s a really good example of how advances in IT can completely change an industry. It might be one of the best examples. It has microeconomic and employment implications within the industry itself and broader effects in how consumers ultimately use the new technologies available to them. So let’s do a case study of sorts using the music industry. And I think most people should be able to relate to this in one way or another.

The groundwork for the massive change within the music industry probably started when Napster first allowed people to download free music from the internet. If anyone doesn’t remember what happened with Napster, read here:

A few years later, Apple introduced the iPod, made some deals and got some licenses from the record labels, and now users have easy access to cheap music online. After Napster, it was inevitable. Now there are plenty of options for people to get music online.

So before the digital music era, everyone who wanted to get the music they wanted had to go to a store and do something like this: 


Now all you need to do is go on the interweb and search for whatever music you’d like to hear, and it will most likely be readily available to you. And it offers consumers a much broader and easier access to listen to new music. This in effect creates greater competition between the musicians themselves and decreases the barriers of entry for new musicians. A Rolling Stone article has Amanda Palmer, former singer and keyboardist of the Dresden Dolls, use the term “working-class musician” to describe the new environment of the music industry. You can read that article here: http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/survival-of-the-fittest-in-the-new-music-industry-20121108

Of course the record companies themselves were the biggest losers. You could argue artists may have been negatively impacted from losing the revenue from record sales, but like the Rolling Stone article says, record sales were never a huge factor in the artist’s incomes. If anything, social media has now provided musicians with a greater benefit than what they previously would have gained in physical record sales. The biggest winners in this new market are of course the consumers. And someone has to design, build, and maintain all of the IT systems involved in making this digital market work, so new jobs were created outside of the music industry.


So is the music industry better off because of the new digital environment? I guess it depends how you look at it. Either way, it definitely has changed. And like the saying goes, it isn’t the strongest or smartest that survive, it is those most adaptable to change.

13 comments:

  1. Do you think that online streaming services like spotify help artists or companies more? If an artist can get their music on such a service, it could help the artist gain notice, but it is much easier for the big labels to get their music streamed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ultimately it depends on how much the exposure increases record sales and concert ticket sales. The artists generate their income mainly from live shows and record companies get their income from record sales. That being said, I do think it helps the artists more.

      Delete
  2. Regardless if users pirate or subscribe to a service provider for media, new technology has enabled consumers to obtain content conveniently, and as a result concert revenue has increased drastically. I believe the new music industry allows artist access to a broader audience, and therefore, increases overall profitability and progresses the industry as a whole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It definitely allows artists to live more comfortably than they would have 10 years ago, especially those who aren't quite mainstream. The overall environment is way more competitive now, which does make it more difficult for artists to "make it big," but the competition comes from the growth that the industry has seen. And everyone has benefited from that.

      Delete
  3. The music industry has most definitely changed in the past decade. iTunes, Pandora, and Rdio, just to name a few, have revolutionized how people listen to music. Whether they are purchasing albums or just streaming music for free, people will always find a way to get the music they want for as cheap as they can get it. This isn't going to change anytime soon. So whether the music producers like it or not, they have to accept the facts and use it to their advantage. Musicians still make an enormous amount of money on country-wide and in some cases world-wide tours. There is no need for musicians to worry about HOW people listen to the music, they should appreciate the fact that people ARE listening to their music.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So how can the record companies use the new environment to their advantage? People have easier, more convenient, and cheaper access to music than they did ten years ago. How can the record companies generate more income now?

      Delete
  4. Personally, I use the subscription based music service, Rhapsody. This service has fundamentally changed the way I listen to music. I used to loan out CD's from the library, then download them to my computer (this was an effective, albeit shady, process). With Rhapsody, the access I have to a cloud of music available either to stream or download has removed the need I have to u
    pur base hard copies of the music. I have found this to be super convenient.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think Rhapsody is a really good service and a great example of just exactly how the new music industry operates. Instead of me explaining why, I'll just post a link.

    http://pipelineproject.org/news/rhapsody-the-original-subscription-based-music-model

    These subscription streaming music services act as a distributor for music in this new industry. And this greater distribution is what actually drives the growth of the industry. That's an obvious statement, but it just restates what we've been talking about in more business terms.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think the use of new technologies for the music industry can both help and hinder an new or popular artist. I myself know many people that download their music for free which in turn could possibly hurt the music industry. But after reading what you had to say I didn't know how much social media has helped artists make up for the money lost with record sales.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think what we are seeing now is the music industry adapting into the new age of obtaining music. The numbers on what these artists make from Youtube, Spotify, and other alternative ways to hear free music, would probably astound us. The embracing of new ways to obtain music is what will prove to be the new measure of success for the music industry.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The music industry has changed dramatically. We can see this with the transfer of physical music products to digital music services. In today's society any type of music can be accessed with a click of a button. Cloud computing has captured the benefits of music services, which enables millions of people to access the music no matterthe location or time zone the person is. Music services such as Spotify and Pandora, have captured a great abundance of visitors on their sites, which means more visitors equals more money. Can't wait for the next evolution of music to come.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The Rolling Stones article was right on point. Artists can make money in many different ways and selling actual CD's or records was not the biggest part of their income. The world is becoming more technological by day. To me this change was very reasonable and obvious. Through the vast number in Apple users, most people are still paying for their music. Albums and singles are sold on iTunes making the options even greater. Music is pretty much a part of everyone's lives, therefore buying it straight off of your phone makes it accessible and easy. I love the direction that the music industry and their sales are going. Unlimited options will always be the best route.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think production companies suffer the worst losses due to the issue of illegally sharing music over the web, however, I think that artists still suffer huge financial and intellectually property losses due to this issue. I am one of the people who practices loyalty to my favorite artists, which means I literally insist on purchasing their music from iTunes or an actual online store even when I can get the music illegally over the web for free, this might sound crazy but I believe it is the right thing to do. I mean how would you feel if you were an artist who did everything they could to produce the best music and dedicatated hours to your work and then you find your music distributed all over the web without any rights given back to you, it is not just a financial issue, it is an issue similar to plagiarism. Artists have the right to their music similar to authors who publish books and can accuse people who copy their writing with plagiarism, artists have the same right to do so but unfortunately they can't because there are millions of people doing it all over the world, because not many people care about copying what's in books anymore!

    ReplyDelete